Maybe a better strategy would be to get a release out soon but not wait 6 months for another release which would contain the Win32 port and the PITR stuff (assuming those aren't done in time for this release).
Just a thought. andrew Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Well, I suppose that history has shown that waiting on specific >> features causes trouble with postgresql development, but I don't see >> why a release can't be based around waiting for feature x as long as >> feature x is being actively worked on by trusted developers who have >> an endgame in sight. > > We have been led down that garden path before, and it's been a losing > proposition every time. > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
