On 5 April 2017 at 23:25, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >> On 2017-04-05 17:18:24 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: >>> On 5 April 2017 at 04:19, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >>> > On 2017-04-04 22:32:40 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: >>> >> I'm much happier with this. I'm still fixing some issues in the tests >>> >> for 03 and tidying them up, but 03 should allow 01 and 02 to be >>> >> reviewed in their proper context now. >>> > >>> > To me this very clearly is too late for v10, and now should be moved to >>> > the next CF. >>> >>> I tend to agree that it's late in the piece. It's still worth cleaning >>> it up into a state ready for early pg11 though. >> >> Totally agreed. > > Based on this exchange, marked as "Moved to next CF".
Yeah. Can't say I like it, but I have to agree. Can get this rolling in early pg11, and that way we can hopefully get support for it into logical replication too. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
