On 2017-04-05 17:18:24 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: > On 5 April 2017 at 04:19, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > On 2017-04-04 22:32:40 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: > >> I'm much happier with this. I'm still fixing some issues in the tests > >> for 03 and tidying them up, but 03 should allow 01 and 02 to be > >> reviewed in their proper context now. > > > > To me this very clearly is too late for v10, and now should be moved to > > the next CF. > > I tend to agree that it's late in the piece. It's still worth cleaning > it up into a state ready for early pg11 though.
Totally agreed. - Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
