On 4/4/17 9:11 AM, Simon Riggs wrote: > On 4 April 2017 at 09:05, David Steele <da...@pgmasters.net> wrote: >> Hi Tomas, >> >> On 4/1/17 5:40 AM, Ashutosh Sharma wrote: >>> >>> Apart from above comments, your patch looks good to me. I have also >>> marked this patch as 'Waiting for Author' in the commitfest. Thanks. >> >> The CF has been extended until April 7 but time is still growing short >> and this thread has been idle for three days. Please respond with a new >> patch by 2017-04-05 00:00 AoE (UTC-12) or this submission will be marked >> "Returned with Feedback". > > We know time is growing short. Is it necessary to say that on every > single thread? What benefit do we get from that?
Hackers has become such a fire hose that I don't take it for granted that all messages are read by everyone. This may be news to some authors, especially those that have not responded on a thread since March 31. > We voted to extend the time until the deadline. In some cases we may > well take it all the way to the deadline, so fighting you or others > trying to reject things *before* the deadline *because* of the > deadline seems weird. My goal is to help people focus on patches that have a chance. At this point I think that includes poking authors who are not being responsive using the limited means at my disposal. > How about we just leave everything until the deadline, then apply the > sword swiftly to anything that remains? I didn't take the extension to mean that I should stop CF management. However, If you think I have exceeded my mandate over the course of the CF, then I'm happy to discuss that. Regards, -- -David da...@pgmasters.net -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
