On 4 April 2017 at 09:05, David Steele <da...@pgmasters.net> wrote: > Hi Tomas, > > On 4/1/17 5:40 AM, Ashutosh Sharma wrote: >> >> Apart from above comments, your patch looks good to me. I have also >> marked this patch as 'Waiting for Author' in the commitfest. Thanks. > > The CF has been extended until April 7 but time is still growing short > and this thread has been idle for three days. Please respond with a new > patch by 2017-04-05 00:00 AoE (UTC-12) or this submission will be marked > "Returned with Feedback".
We know time is growing short. Is it necessary to say that on every single thread? What benefit do we get from that? We voted to extend the time until the deadline. In some cases we may well take it all the way to the deadline, so fighting you or others trying to reject things *before* the deadline *because* of the deadline seems weird. How about we just leave everything until the deadline, then apply the sword swiftly to anything that remains? -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
