On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
> > Hello, > > I think that you could use another pattern where you init the >>> PQExpBufferData structure instead of create it, so that only the string >>> is >>> malloced. >>> >> >> In v26, I have the functions return PQExpBuffer. The two calling functions >> then free it, which should solve any leak. >> > > Yep, it works as well. > > Here's an addendum that does that. I can combine them in v27, but figured >> this was quicker. >> > > It works. > > However having just one full patch with a number would help so that I can > say "ready to committer" or not on something. > > -- > Fabien. > And here you go (sorry for the delay, had errands to run).
0001-psql-if-v27.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
