On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > To put this in another light, had this issue been brought up post > feature-freeze, your definition would mean that we would only have the > option to either revert the patch entirely or to live with the poor > naming scheme.
Yeah, and I absolutely agree with that. In fact, I think it's *already* past the time when we should be considering the changes you want. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
