On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 8:02 AM, David Rowley > <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> On 7 March 2017 at 15:21, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> +1. How about changing the description of >>> max_parallel_workers_per_gather to "taken from max_worker_processes, >>> limited by max_parallel_workers"? >> >> Thanks for looking. >> >> Seems more accurate to say that it's "taken from >> max_parallel_workers", maybe. >> > > I thought of saying similar to what we have in docs, however the way > you have written works for me.
Committed. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
