On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2017-03-01 10:20:41 -0800, David Fetter wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:45:40AM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> > On 2/28/17 04:24, vinayak wrote: >> > > The view provides the information of analyze command progress details as >> > > follows >> > > postgres=# \d pg_stat_progress_analyze >> > > View "pg_catalog.pg_stat_progress_analyze" >> > >> > Hmm, do we want a separate "progress" system view for every kind of >> > command? What if someone comes up with a progress checker for CREATE >> > INDEX, REINDEX, CLUSTER, etc.? > > I don't think that'd be that bad, otherwise the naming of the fields is > complicated.
+1. I suppose if it gets really out of control we might have to rethink, but 2 is not 50, and having appropriate column names is worth a lot. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
