On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Tomas Vondra
<tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> BTW I've noticed the pageinspect version is 1.6, but we only have
> pageinspect--1.5.sql (and upgrade script to 1.6). Not sure that's entirely
> intentional?
Actually, that's the New Way. See 40b449ae84dcf71177d7749a7b0c582b64dc15f0.
+extern Datum bt_metap(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS);
+extern Datum bt_page_items(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS);
+extern Datum bt_page_items_bytea(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS);
+extern Datum bt_page_stats(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS);
Not needed. PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1 now does it.
- values[j++] = psprintf("%d", stat.blkno);
- values[j++] = psprintf("%c", stat.type);
- values[j++] = psprintf("%d", stat.live_items);
- values[j++] = psprintf("%d", stat.dead_items);
- values[j++] = psprintf("%d", stat.avg_item_size);
- values[j++] = psprintf("%d", stat.page_size);
- values[j++] = psprintf("%d", stat.free_size);
- values[j++] = psprintf("%d", stat.btpo_prev);
- values[j++] = psprintf("%d", stat.btpo_next);
- values[j++] = psprintf("%d", (stat.type == 'd') ? stat.btpo.xact : stat.btp
o.level);
- values[j++] = psprintf("%d", stat.btpo_flags);
+ values[j] = palloc(32);
+ snprintf(values[j++], 32, "%d", stat.blkno);
+ values[j] = palloc(32);
+ snprintf(values[j++], 32, "%c", stat.type);
+ values[j] = palloc(32);
+ snprintf(values[j++], 32, "%d", stat.live_items);
+ values[j] = palloc(32);
+ snprintf(values[j++], 32, "%d", stat.dead_items);
+ values[j] = palloc(32);
+ snprintf(values[j++], 32, "%d", stat.avg_item_size);
+ values[j] = palloc(32);
+ snprintf(values[j++], 32, "%d", stat.page_size);
+ values[j] = palloc(32);
+ snprintf(values[j++], 32, "%d", stat.free_size);
+ values[j] = palloc(32);
+ snprintf(values[j++], 32, "%d", stat.btpo_prev);
+ values[j] = palloc(32);
+ snprintf(values[j++], 32, "%d", stat.btpo_next);
+ values[j] = palloc(32);
+ if (stat.type == 'd')
+ snprintf(values[j++], 32, "%d", stat.btpo.xact);
+ else
+ snprintf(values[j++], 32, "%d", stat.btpo.level);
+ values[j] = palloc(32);
+ snprintf(values[j++], 32, "%d", stat.btpo_flags);
This does not seem like a good idea in any way, and the patch has
several instances of it.
I don't object to the concept, though.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
