On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 20:48, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > If we do this, could we get rid of the messy autocommit GUC option and > > handle autocommit in the client? > > Hmm ... that's a thought ... not very backwards-compatible with 7.3, > but I think I like it better than continuing on with the GUC option. > As you say, that path is looking messier all the time.
Yes, definitely -- replacing the 7.3 GUC option would be great, that's a pretty bad hack IMHO. Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
