Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I was willing to add a hack to enable default column labels to be > > "table.column" --- that seemed like the least obtrusive. > > Most of the definitional issues still apply: which table name are you > going to insert, and under what conditions? > > If we're revising the protocol, there's no reason to hack up the column > label to carry two pieces of info; it'd be cleaner to provide a separate > slot in the T message to carry the table name. I just want to see a > reasonably complete spec for what the feature is supposed to do, before > we buy into it ...
I don't think we can get a complete spec, and hence the _hack_ idea. :-) -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
