On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 6:35 PM, Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:35 AM, Thomas Munro >> <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 1:55 AM, Thomas Munro >>> <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>>> Here's a new version to apply on top of dsa-v7.patch. >>> >>> Here's a version to go with dsa-v8.patch. >> >> All right, so I've committed this, but not before (1) renaming some >> things that you added, (2) adding documentation for the new LWLock >> tranche, (3) not creating the DSA in the "simulated DSM using >> backend-private memory" case, and (4) some cosmetic tweaks. > > Thanks! Hmm, so now in rare circumstances we can finish up running > ExecXXXInitializeDSM, but later have estate->es_query_dsa == NULL. > This is something to be careful about.
Yes. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
