On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Thoughts? >> >> Hearing no objections, I've gone ahead and committed this. If that >> makes somebody really unhappy I can revert it, but I am betting that >> the real story is that nobody cares about preserving T_ID(). > > AFAICT the comment on LWLockRegisterTranche is confused; it talks about > an allocated object being passed, but there isn't any.
Oops. Thanks, will fix. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
