On 12/5/16 3:27 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:50 AM, Haribabu Kommi
<kommi.harib...@gmail.com> wrote:
Moved to next CF with needs review.
1. patch doesn't receive any full review in the commitfest
2. Patch received feedback at the end of commitfest.
The number of patches that got this treatment seems quite large. If
the people who are submitting patches are also reviewing other patches
of comparable difficulty, this really shouldn't be happening.
Something isn't working well, here.
Yeah. :( (and I'm embarrassed to admit I'm part of the problem :()
I think it would be good to have a different status for patches that got
bumped to the next CF due to insufficient review. It's already unfair to
authors, but at least if there was a separate status those patches could
be prioritized next time around. It would also allow tracking how big a
problem that is from one CF to the next.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
