On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Thomas Munro
> <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> Please find attached dsa-v8.patch, and also a small test module for
>> running random allocate/free exercises and dumping the internal
>> allocator state.
>
> OK, I've committed the main patch.

...but the buildfarm isn't very happy about it.

tern complains:

In file included from dsa.c:58:0:
../../../../src/include/utils/dsa.h:59:1: error: unknown type name
'pg_atomic_uint64'
 typedef pg_atomic_uint64 dsa_pointer_atomic;

...but that code is only compiled if #if DSA_POINTER_SIZEOF == 4 fails
to be true.  And that should always be true unless
PG_HAVE_ATOMIC_U64_SUPPORT is defined.  So apparently tern claims to
PG_HAVE_ATOMIC_U64_SUPPORT but doesn't actually define
pg_atomic_uint64?  That doesn't seem right.

The failures on several other BF members appear to be similar.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to