On 2016-08-15 18:15:23 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Therefore, I plan to commit this patch, removing the #include > > <stddef.h> unless someone convinces me we need it, shortly after > > development for v10 opens, unless there are objections before then. > > Hearing no objections, done.
I'd have objected, if I hadn't been on vacation. While I intuitively *do* think that the increased wait-list overhead won't be relevant, I also know that my intuition has frequently been wrong around the lwlock code. This needs some benchmarks on a 4+ socket machine, first. Something exercising the slow path obviously. E.g. a pgbench with a small number of writers, and a large number of writers. Regards, Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
