On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 02:48:55PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 7/30/16 2:16 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > The second patch does what Tom suggests above by outputting only "KB", > > and it supports "kB" for backward compatibility. What it doesn't do is > > to allow arbitrary case, which I think would be a step backward. The > > second patch actually does match the JEDEC standard, except for allowing > > "kB". > > If we're going to make changes, why not bite the bullet and output KiB? > > I have never heard of JEDEC, so I'm less inclined to accept their > "standard" at this point.
I already address this. While I have never heard of JEDEC either, I have seen KB, and have never seen KiB, hence my argument that KiB would lead to more confusion than we have now. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
