On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:44 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Sure looks that way from here. Copy-and-paste from the previous >>>> line in pg_proc.h, perhaps? >> >>> Yes, that's clearly wrong. > > Attached patch (pg_replication_origin_xact_reset_9.6.patch) fixes this. > We need to apply this at least before RC1 of PostgreSQL9.6 will be released > because the patch needs the change of catalog version. > >>> Damn. Can't fix that for 9.5 anymore. The >>> function isn't all that important (especially not from SQL), but still, >>> that's annoying. I'm inclined to just remove the args in 9.6. We could >>> also add a note to the 9.5 docs, adding that the arguments are there by >>> error? > > What about the attched patch (pg_replication_origin_xact_reset_9.5.patch)?
I think you should apply these ASAP. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
