I've tested patch with this query https://gist.github.com/x4m/fee16ed1a55217528f036983d88771b4 Test specs were: Ubuntu 14 LTS VM, dynamic RAM, hypervisor Windows Server 2016, SSD disk, core i5-2500. Configuration: out of the box master make.
On 10 test runs timing of select statement: AVG 3739.8 ms, STD 435.4193 With patch applied (as is) : 3017.8 ms, STD 319.893 Increase of overflow const showed no statistically viable performance improvement (though, I do not worth doing). 2016-07-27 17:32 GMT+05:00 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > For that matter, spelling INT_MAX as 0x7FFFFFF is also not per project style. Sure, 0x7FFFFFF was not for code but for metal arithmetics. I would even add that INT_MAX is system-dependent and varies in different specs. I'd suggest INT32_MAX. Best regards, Andrey Borodin, Octonica & Ural Federal University. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
