On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 8:53 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> I thought I sat through, at least, most of it, but you barely gave >> anyone else a chance to talk, which kind of misses the point of an >> unconference. The portion which I attended was not about how to move >> the development of the feature forward, but just involved describing >> it. I thought it was a shame that the time wasn't used better. > > I think the problem was that I gave everybody an even shot at commenting, > rather than focusing on a few key developers.
If that had been what happened, I wouldn't consider it a problem, but I don't think that's what happened. >> I really don't think that's accurate. There might have been 50% of >> people who thought that not having DDL was acceptable, but I think >> there were very few people who found it preferable. > Without being in the room, its kinda hard for you to know, right? I was in the room for that part. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
