On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > David Fetter wrote: >> As a relatively (to our users) minor course correction, I would like >> to propose the following: > >> - Develop a logical upgrade path as a part of the (Yay! Sexy!) logical >> replication that's already in large part built. >> >> This path would, of course, run either locally or across a network, >> and be testable in both cases. > > This is one use case that pglogical intends to fulfill. If you're able > to contribute to that project, I'm sure many would appreciate it. Right > now the hottest question seems to be: is this something that should be > an extension, or should it be part of core with its own set of DDL etc? > The current patch is geared towards the former, so if the community at > large prefers to have it as the latter and would oppose the former, now > is the time to speak up so that the course can be corrected.
There was an unconference session on this topic at PGCon and quite a number of people there stated that they found DDL to be an ease-of-use feature and wanted to have it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
