On 10 May 2016 at 17:20, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2016-05-10 12:28:57 +0200, Simon Riggs wrote: > > On 10 May 2016 at 09:05, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > > > > > > Is anybody ready with a good defense for SatisfiesToast not doing any > > > actual liveliness checks? > > > > > > > I provided a patch earlier that rechecks the OID fetched from a toast > chunk > > matches the OID requested. > > They match in this case, so that's not likely to help with the issue at > hand? >
I can see, but I was answering your more general question above with what I had available. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ <http://www.2ndquadrant.com/> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
