On 2016-05-10 12:28:57 +0200, Simon Riggs wrote: > On 10 May 2016 at 09:05, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > > > Is anybody ready with a good defense for SatisfiesToast not doing any > > actual liveliness checks? > > > > I provided a patch earlier that rechecks the OID fetched from a toast chunk > matches the OID requested.
They match in this case, so that's not likely to help with the issue at hand? - Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
