On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2016-03-27 12:38:25 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Alexander Korotkov < > > a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > > > > > Thank you very much for testing! > > > I also got access to 4 x 18 Intel server with 144 threads. I'm going to > > > post results of tests on this server in next Monday. > > > > > > > I've run pgbench tests on this machine: pgbench -s 1000 -c $clients -j > 100 > > -M prepared -T 300. > > See results in the table and chart. > > > > clients master v3 v5 > > 1 11671 12507 12679 > > 2 24650 26005 25010 > > 4 49631 48863 49811 > > 8 96790 96441 99946 > > 10 121275 119928 124100 > > 20 243066 243365 246432 > > 30 359616 342241 357310 > > 40 431375 415310 441619 > > 50 489991 489896 500590 > > 60 538057 636473 554069 > > 70 588659 714426 738535 > > 80 405008 923039 902632 > > 90 295443 1181247 1155918 > > 100 258695 1323125 1325019 > > 110 238842 1393767 1410274 > > 120 226018 1432504 1474982 > > 130 215102 1465459 1503241 > > 140 206415 1470454 1505380 > > 150 197850 1475479 1519908 > > 160 190935 1420915 1484868 > > 170 185835 1438965 1453128 > > 180 182519 1416252 1453098 > > > > My conclusions are following: > > 1) We don't observe any regression in v5 in comparison to master. > > 2) v5 in most of cases slightly outperforms v3. > > What commit did you base these tests on? I guess something recent, after > 98a64d0bd? > Yes, more recent than 98a64d0bd. It was based on 676265eb7b. > > I'm going to do some code cleanup of v5 in Monday > > Ok, I'll try to do a review and possibly commit after that. > Sounds good. ------ Alexander Korotkov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
