On 2016-03-27 12:38:25 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Alexander Korotkov < > a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > > > Thank you very much for testing! > > I also got access to 4 x 18 Intel server with 144 threads. I'm going to > > post results of tests on this server in next Monday. > > > > I've run pgbench tests on this machine: pgbench -s 1000 -c $clients -j 100 > -M prepared -T 300. > See results in the table and chart. > > clients master v3 v5 > 1 11671 12507 12679 > 2 24650 26005 25010 > 4 49631 48863 49811 > 8 96790 96441 99946 > 10 121275 119928 124100 > 20 243066 243365 246432 > 30 359616 342241 357310 > 40 431375 415310 441619 > 50 489991 489896 500590 > 60 538057 636473 554069 > 70 588659 714426 738535 > 80 405008 923039 902632 > 90 295443 1181247 1155918 > 100 258695 1323125 1325019 > 110 238842 1393767 1410274 > 120 226018 1432504 1474982 > 130 215102 1465459 1503241 > 140 206415 1470454 1505380 > 150 197850 1475479 1519908 > 160 190935 1420915 1484868 > 170 185835 1438965 1453128 > 180 182519 1416252 1453098 > > My conclusions are following: > 1) We don't observe any regression in v5 in comparison to master. > 2) v5 in most of cases slightly outperforms v3.
What commit did you base these tests on? I guess something recent, after 98a64d0bd? > I'm going to do some code cleanup of v5 in Monday Ok, I'll try to do a review and possibly commit after that. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
