On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 12:38 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thoughts? I have registered that in the CF app, and a patch is attached.
It is very difficult to believe that this is a good idea:
--- a/src/backend/replication/libpqwalreceiver/libpqwalreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/libpqwalreceiver/libpqwalreceiver.c
@@ -445,6 +445,7 @@ libpqrcv_PQexec(const char *query)
if (PQresultStatus(lastResult) == PGRES_COPY_IN ||
PQresultStatus(lastResult) == PGRES_COPY_OUT ||
PQresultStatus(lastResult) == PGRES_COPY_BOTH ||
+ PQresultStatus(lastResult) == PGRES_FATAL_ERROR ||
PQstatus(streamConn) == CONNECTION_BAD)
break;
}
I mean, why would it be a good idea to blindly skip over fatal errors?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
