On 2016-03-14 17:17:02 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There hasn't been a new version of this patch in 9 months, you're > > clearly not in a hurry to produce one, and nobody else seems to feel > > strongly that this is something that needs to be done at all. I think > > we could just let this go and be just fine, but instead of doing that > > and moving onto patches that people do feel strongly about, we're > > arguing about this. Bummer. > > I'm busy working on fixing an OpenSSL bug affecting all released > versions right at the moment, but have a number of complex 9.6 patches > to review, most of which are in need of support. I'm very busy.
So? You're not the only one. I don't see why we shouldn't move this to 'returned with feedback' until there's a new version. Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
