On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> This patch was reviewed during CF 2016-01 and has not been updated for >> CF 2016-03. I think we should mark it Returned with Feedback. > > I have a full plate at the moment, Robert, both as a reviewer and as a > patch author. This patch is basically uncontroversial, and is built to > make the AM interface clearer, and the design of speculative insertion > easier to understand. It's clear we should have it. I'll get around to > revising it before too long.
Only one version of this patch has been sent at the beginning of this thread, and Heikki has clearly expressed his disagreement about at least a portion of it at the beginning of this thread, so I find it hard to define it as an "uncontroversial" thing and something that is clear to have as things stand. Seeing a new version soon would be a good next step I guess. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
