Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Anyway, assuming that the iteration count was already being used > correctly, then as far as I'm concerned we're ready to go. The attached > patch is what I would commit.
I read some more (gnupg code as well as our own) and applied some more tweaks, and pushed. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
