"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Maybe we should create a new type 'inet6'???
I'd lean towards allowing the existing inet and cidr types to store both
v4 and v6 addresses, if at all possible. Is there a good motivation for
doing otherwise?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
