> Yeah. This is a pretty self-contained problem, it just needs someone > who's motivated to work on it. Mostly what we need is to understand how > we want to extend the previously-agreed-to I/O behaviors for IPv4 inet > and cidr types into the v6 domain. (Or should we back up and ask if the > inet/cidr division still makes sense in the v6 world? I hope so, but > if not we should face up to it...)
Maybe we should create a new type 'inet6'??? Chris ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
