On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Here is a first pass at that. [...]

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:23 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> file_fdw is parallel-safe, ...

And here is a patch to apply on top of the last one, to make file_fdw
return true.  But does it really work correctly under parallelism?

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment: file-fdw-parallel-safe.patch
Description: Binary data

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to