On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 01:55:23PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 01/02/16 13:36, Andres Freund wrote: > >On 2016-01-28 06:03:02 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> Reported-by: > >> Bug: > >> Author: > >> Reviewed-by: > >> Tested-by: > >> Backpatch-through: > > > >I personally, and I realize that I'm likely alone on that, would really > >like to see references to relevant threads. A year after a commit or > >such it often starts to get hard to know which threads a commit was > >about. Often it's easy enough if it's about a single feature, but > >bugfixes often originate in threads that have no directly corresponding > >thread. And often the commit happens a while after there's been activity > >in a thread. I spent days searching what thread "per discussion" in > >commit messages refers to. > > +1. I also quite often look at a commit message, and then hunt the "per > discussion". A message-id would save some time there.
+1 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
