David Steele wrote: > On 1/31/16 8:07 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > I'm giving > > this patch some more time by moving it to next commitfest instead. > > I was under the mistaken impression that the CF was two months long so I > appreciate getting a little more time.
Yeah, sorry to disappoint but my intention is to close shop as soon as possible. Commitfests are supposed to last one month only, leaving the month before the start of the next one free so that committers and reviewers can enjoy life. Anyway, what would *you* do with any additional time? It's reviewers that need to chime in when a patch is in needs-review state. You already did your part by submitting. Anyway I think the tests here are massive and the code is not; perhaps people get the mistaken impression that this is a huge amount of code which scares them. Perhaps you could split it up in (1) code and (2) tests, which wouldn't achieve any technical benefit but would offer some psychological comfort to potential reviewers. You know it's all psychology in these parts. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
