On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Alexander Korotkov <a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > Hi, Dilip! > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Michael Paquier >> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > Test3: >>> > pgbench -i -s 100 postgres >>> > pgbench -c$ -j$ -Mprepared -S postgres >>> > >>> > Client Base Pached >>> > >>> > 1 20555 19404 >>> > 32 375919 332670 >>> > 64 509067 440680 >>> > 128 431346 415121 >>> > 256 380926 379176 >>> >>> It seems like you did a copy-paste of the results with s=100 and >>> s=300. Both are showing the exact same numbers. >> >> >> Oops, my mistake, re-pasting the correct results for s=100 >> >> pgbench -i -s 100 postgres >> pgbench -c$ -j$ -Mprepared -S postgres >> >> Client Base Pached >> >> 1 20548 20791 >> 32 372633 355356 >> 64 532052 552148 >> 128 412755 478826 >> 256 346701 372057 > > > Could you please re-run these tests few times? > Just to be sure it's a reproducible regression with s=300 and not a > statistical error.
Probably want to run for at least 5 minutes via -T 300 merlin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
