Hi, Dilip! On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Michael Paquier < > michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Test3: >> > pgbench -i -s 100 postgres >> > pgbench -c$ -j$ -Mprepared -S postgres >> > >> > Client Base Pached >> > >> > 1 20555 19404 >> > 32 375919 332670 >> > 64 509067 440680 >> > 128 431346 415121 >> > 256 380926 379176 >> >> It seems like you did a copy-paste of the results with s=100 and >> s=300. Both are showing the exact same numbers. > > > Oops, my mistake, re-pasting the correct results for s=100 > > pgbench -i -s 100 postgres > pgbench -c$ -j$ -Mprepared -S postgres > > Client Base Pached > > 1 20548 20791 > 32 372633 355356 > 64 532052 552148 > 128 412755 478826 > 256 346701 372057 > Could you please re-run these tests few times? Just to be sure it's a reproducible regression with s=300 and not a statistical error. ------ Alexander Korotkov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
