On 2016-01-25 15:02:02 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Andres Freund wrote: > > On 2016-01-25 13:36:04 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > * https://commitfest.postgresql.org/8/260/ > > > checkpoint continuous flushing > > > > FWIW, I've been working and benchmarking this a lot over the last > > weeks. After finally nailing down the performance regression due to wal > > writer, thins are looking good. I plan to post an updated version soon. > > Excellent. I assume the walwriter bug is going to get fixed separately, > probably backpatched too?
I definitely have it as a separate patch, and plan to commit it as such. But I'm doubtful about backpatching it - without the controlled sorting & flushing the impact isn't *that* big (i.e. not a factor of 5-10), and it could also cause performance regressions. We could later redecide, but I'd rather focus on working on master. Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
