These are the numbers after one week of commitfest work: Needs review: 65. Waiting on Author: 14. Ready for Committer: 6. Committed: 14. Total: 99.
The attentive reader might notice that we grew one more patch since last week, which is the "VACUUM progress checker" thingy that has been under active review. We went from 8 committed patches to 14. At the current rate of 6 patches per week it would take us 12 weeks to close the commitfest, which doesn't sound very good. There are a number of patches in Needs-review state which haven't seen any pgsql-hackers activity in a long while. I'm particularly concerned about the following patches: * Support multiple synchronous standby servers * Access method extendability * Partial sort * add 'waiting for replication' to pg_stat_activity.state * More stable query plans via more predictable column statistics * Statistics for array types * Declarative partitioning * Table Partition + Join Pushdown * multivariate statistics It would be very helpful of a reviewer to look at those patches. Some committers have assigned patches to themselves: * Andres Freund Speedup timestamp/time/date output functions * Peter Eisentraut remove wal_level archive * Tom Lane Rework index access method interface * Teodor Sigaev New gist vacuum * Stephen Frost Default Roles * Simon Riggs Fix handling on XLOG_RUNNING_XACTS generated by bgwriter on idle systems I assume this means they intend to commit them in some reasonable timeframe (possibly after some rework). If this is not the case, please let us know. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
