On 1/21/16 2:29 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
I also think there should be some way to give credit to CFM, if it is difficult to do anything related to money, then we can enforce that if CFM submits any patches for next CF, then those should be prioritised.
Personally, I don't see why we have our scarcest resource doing what is essentially a project management task, especially when at least one commercial company has offered to donate paid staff time.
I don't think the last CF of 9.6 is the time to experiment, but I think we should try using a PM for the first CF of 9.7.
-- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
