On 6 January 2016 at 20:09, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> It seems like a useful function to have, but perhaps it should just be >> called trim() rather than numeric_trim(), for consistency with the >> names of the other numeric functions, which don't start with >> "numeric_". > > That wouldn't work in this case, because we have hard-coded parser > productions for TRIM(). >
Ah. Good point. Pity -- I would have liked a nice short name for this, in a similar vein to the existing numeric functions. Regards, Dean -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
