On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> writes: >> On 1/3/16 10:26 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: >>> Thanks, this is more or less what I... just did.. > >> Sorry, didn't realize you were on it. > >>> A couple of tests in regproc.sql would be a good addition as well. > >> Added. I'm gonna call this good for now. Note this is just against HEAD >> since I don't have 9.5 setup yet. Presumably the patch should still apply... > > I'll take a look, but Michael, if you have time to review, an extra set > of eyeballs wouldn't hurt. There is no margin for error right now.
I'm just on it :) Will update in a couple of minutes, I noticed some stuff in Jim's patch. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
