Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> writes:
> On 1/3/16 10:26 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Thanks, this is more or less what I... just did..
> Sorry, didn't realize you were on it.
>> A couple of tests in regproc.sql would be a good addition as well.
> Added. I'm gonna call this good for now. Note this is just against HEAD
> since I don't have 9.5 setup yet. Presumably the patch should still apply...
I'll take a look, but Michael, if you have time to review, an extra set
of eyeballs wouldn't hurt. There is no margin for error right now.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
