On 12/28/2015 11:48 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> writes: >> I retract my earlier suggestion of doing HEAD different from >> REL9_5_STABLE, at least for the moment. My patch for pg_controldata >> related functions is going to impact all this anyway, so we might as >> well not fuss about it now. > > Seems reasonable. > >> Any objections to the attached? > > Looks OK in a quick once-over.
Pushed to HEAD and 9.5 Joe -- Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
