Joe Conway wrote: > On 12/28/2015 09:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> writes: > >> Ok, but now next question -- should we just change the user visible > >> output to oldestCommitXID/newestCommitXID, or should we change the > >> variable name everywhere it appears in source as well? Looks like each > >> one appears about 25-30 times scattered across 9 or 10 files. Since they > >> are new in 9.5, if we're going to change them, I'd think we ought to do > >> it now or never. > > > > The name is just as misleading at the source-code level, maybe more so > > since they're all just numbers in C. +1 for changing it everywhere > > before somebody makes a mistake based on the incorrect names. > > Ok, I'm on it now
Great, thanks. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
