> Honestly I'm not so enthusiastic about scrollable cursors. > Even though PostgreSQL provides an efficient scrollable > cursor, I would use it little unless it could survive > across transactions. > > Anyway it's too bad that FETCH LAST means FETCH ALL. I would remove LAST, RELATIVE and SCROLL keywords for cursor related operations if there's no objection. regards, Hiroshi Inoue ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: w... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAS... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAS... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAS... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAS... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAS... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAS... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAS... Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAS... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAS... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAS... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAS... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAS... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAS... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAS... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAS... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAS... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAS... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD