Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Sure. FETCH n in Postgres has always corresponded to FETCH RELATIVE n.
IIRC in SQL standard FETCH retrieves rows one by one.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
http://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
- [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] MOVE LAST: why? Hiroshi Inoue
