Hi, On 2015-12-03 16:10:51 -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote: > Is the c.h change above on anything resembling the right track for > a patch for this? If not, what would such a patch look like?
I think a better path would be to add fallback support for 64bit atomics - like we already have for 32bit. That should really only take a few lines. Then you can use pg_atomic_read_u64/pg_atomic_write_u64 and all the rest of the atomics api. For that to be helpful we'd want a more efficient read/write implementation for some platforms (falls back to compare/exchange right now), but that's easy. Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
