On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:10 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgri...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is the c.h change above on anything resembling the right track for > a patch for this? If not, what would such a patch look like?
It would be nicer if we could come up with an interface that didn't require #ifdefs everywhere it's used. Something like ... pg_maybe_atomic int64 threshold_timestamp; ... SpinLockAcquire_if_no_atomics(...) threshold_timestamp = &oldSnapshotControl->threshold_timestamp; SpinLockRelease_if_no_atomics(...) return threshold_timestamp; -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
