2015-11-16 14:17 GMT+01:00 Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com>: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:35 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: > > >>> And perhaps associated PIDs? > > >> > > >> Yeah, that can be useful, if others also feel like it is important, I > can > > >> look into preparing a patch for the same. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > Thom, what do you think the EXPLAIN output should look like, > > specifically? Or anyone else who feels like answering. > > > > I don't think it would be very useful to repeat the entire EXPLAIN > > output n times, once per worker. That sounds like a loser. > > > > Yes, it doesn't seem good idea to repeat the information, but what > about the cases when different workers perform scan on different > relations (partitions in case of Append node) or may be performs a > different operation in Sort or join node parallelism. >
+1 Pavel > > > With Regards, > Amit Kapila. > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com >
